The certified public accounting (CPA) firms that perform the audit and other attest engagements for the
local government agencies and quasi-public organizations (local auditees) 
that report to the Louisiana Legislative Auditor (LLA) range in size from sole practitioners with one partner; to national firms with hundreds of staff, seniors, managers and partners.
Smaller firms sometimes engage for an audit or other attest engagement that they do not have the staff to perform. Those firms may partner with another CPA firm on LLA’s approved list to provide staff for the engagement, or may enlist the services of a CPA firm or sole practitioner that is not on LLA’s approved list.
LLA encourages interaction and collaboration between CPA firms, especially those on LLA’s approved list. Much may be gained by maintaining an open line of communication between CPA firms.
All CPA firms should be aware that the firm that signs a local auditee audit, review/attestation or compilation report is ultimately responsible for the quality of the engagement, whether they use their own staff or the staff of other CPA firms to perform the engagement.
CPA firms that are considering using other CPA firms as engagement staff should be aware that CPA firms that were formerly on LLA’s list of approved CPAs, but are no longer on the list, may have been suspended for cause; and may not always be forthcoming with this information.
On audits of large local auditees, or local auditees with several component units, the audit work may be divided between several firms. In these types of audits, the CPA firm that is auditing the primary government should consider whether the requirements of AU-C 600,
Audits of Group Financial Statements, apply.
A CPA firm that engages for an audit, but who contracts the majority of the field work and supervision for the fieldwork out to another CPA firm, should consider whether they have enough knowledge of and participation in the engagement to sign the audit report. It may be best for the approved CPA firm to withdraw from the engagement, and the CPA firm that is performing the fieldwork be the auditor of record. In this instance, the approved CPA firm should discuss the matter with the local auditee and the firm that is performing the fieldwork. If all parties are in agreement that the auditor of record should be changed, the CPA firm that has the approved engagement should
contact LLA about
cancelling the engagement .
QUESTIONS:
Q. I am considering using the services of a sole practitioner as staff on an audit. The sole practitioner used to be on LLA’s approved list of CPAs, and used to perform the audit that I will be performing. I noticed that the sole practitioner is not currently on LLA’s approved list of CPA’s. Will LLA tell me if the reason the sole practitioner is no longer on the list?
A. LLA will confirm to a CPA (or anyone else) whether a CPA firm is currently on LLA’s approved list. However, LLA regards most other information regarding any firm that is or has been on LLA’s approved list as confidential, particularly pertaining to suspension and other disciplinary actions taken by LLA.
It is the responsibility of the CPA firm to fully evaluate the qualifications of any staff they plan to use on an audit, whether the staff is directly employed by the CPA firm, or is working for the CPA firm on a contractual basis.
It is also the responsibility of the CPA firm who signs the report to perform the engagement in accordance with all applicable standards. Any disciplinary action taken by LLA for substandard work performed on an engagement will be taken regarding the firm that signed the report, not the staff that was used by the CPA firm to perform the work on the engagement.